Wikimedia-oriented discussion, which contains subforums focusing on editors, the Wikipedia bureaucracy, meta discussion, articles and general Wikimedia-focused topics not fitting elsewhere.Wikipedia Review's publicly accessible forums are broken up into four general topic areas: Philip Coppens used posts made on Wikipedia Review to help construct a report, published in Nexus Magazine, on WikiScanner and allegations that intelligence agencies had been using Wikipedia to spread disinformation. The Independent noted that "allegations against certain administrators came to a head on a site called Wikipedia Review, where people debate the administrators' actions." The Irish technology website Silicon Republic suggested visiting Wikipedia Review in order to "follow disputes, discussions, editors and general bureaucracy on Wikipedia". Cade Metz, writing for The Register, credited Wikipedia Review with the discovery of a private mailing list that led to the resignation of a Wikipedia administrator he also wrote that a Wikipedia proposal called "BADSITES" intended to ban the mention of Wikipedia Review and similar sites on Wikipedia. Seth Finkelstein wrote in The Guardian that Wikipedia Review has provided a focal point for investigation into Wikipedia-related matters such as the " Essjay controversy". Statement made when the site was out of service in 2008, Wikipedia Review Imagine a world in which human beings are not user accounts, are not programmable, and are not mere words on a display screen. It is not intended to be predictable, consistent, or dull. Like-mindedness does not imply singularity of purpose respect for the rights of one group does not imply disrespect for the rights of another. It is not a monolithic entity, nor the sum of its parts.
It does not exist to corrupt, but to expose corruption it does not exist to tear down institutions, but to expose the ways in which institutions are torn down it does not exist to hate, but is meant to expose hate in others. It is not meant as a resource or training ground for those who would instill fear and misery in others. Wikipedia Review is not a conspiracy, a team-building exercise, a role-playing game, or an experiment in collusion. Wikipedia Review was cited for its discussion of wiki-editing concepts and its participation in the evaluation of the Palo Alto Research Company's WikiDashboard.
#3dxchat wiki registration
The site required registration using a valid e-mail address to post and blacklisted email providers that allowed anonymity so as to discourage the operation of multiple accounts by a single user. On 19 February 2006 it moved to its own domain name using Invision Power Board software. The site was founded in November 2005 by "Igor Alexander", and hosted by ProBoards.